Why not design future around 7 billion wonderful livelihoods
After the first year of Biden we can see that in spite of enough technology to save the human race, corralled by insanely lonely men like Mr Putin we are racing faster than ever towards extinction half way through the 15 year period that all nations had committed to the sustainability goals (ecop26 EUN). Why is this? - its a problem of media- which in turn is a wicked Keynesian problem of Governance, Societal and Environmental Markets (known the other way round by worlds biggest decision makers as ESG -see NYccAI.com for 15 annual spring briefings).
CRIMSON LIFESTYLES: Although Harvard has taken as late as 26 April 2022 to admit their debt to black americans is way north of 100 million dollars (imagine if they had admitted this before Biller Gates designed DOS). other far north friends and I can trace through my family ( diaspora scots, irish...) why the root cause of this [problem is that white institutions have not cared locally enough about the simplest human right : that of the next girl or boy born anywhere to have a fair chance of life.
My family has a lot of evidence on this ; in our case it can be classified around tHEse time periods: 2022 to 2000; TO 1984 TO 1976 TO 1962 TO 1945 TO 1936 TO 1758 - each of which we observed FROM SOME QUITE DEEP GLOBAL VILLAGE DATUM
1962 back to 1951 back to 1945; 1951 was for my family the occasion of the greatest jopurnalist scoop ever; von neumann briefed my father on asking leaderes about what would they do with 100 times more tech every decade to 2020s (som,e now call this industrial revolution 3, 4; in silicon valley from 1965 they have also called its moore's law; my father's small role in future histoiry : he asked economist jouramlsits to appply this question for the next third of the century; this too the economist from 1951 3rd ranked weekly journal to one of a kindf gloabal viewspaper; The Economist had a weird history it was born in 1843 as a royal society chat sheet that got turned into queen visctora's attermpt to chnage english constitution from presiding over slave making empire to commonwealth); this has been the crisis embedded in tyhe english mindset since the beginning of engines scotalnds 1760s (some would say since the beginning of discovery on new worlds started in 1490s when the race started to own the most agressive navy)
|2022 back to 2000 -business & social models of mobile digital age spun hatred and short-termsim opposite to sdgs; raised bodres between nations during the period all human communities needed to go borderless on human right goal||2000 back to 1984 (we lost the chnace to value the web as the an open learning network to shortt term commerce and nastier media)m/TD>||1984 back to 1976 ( by now my father was launching the new socio-economic genere of entrepreneuriual revolution with 15 yeras of evidence of cases on asia rising through a blend of supervillaige and supervity whose trades needed over time to be winw-in not zero sum; in fact if voin eneuman used the vocabularu IR3 - he would definme that as eera of applying 100 times more etch to way above zero sum games- THE OPPOSITE TO LEGISLATIRS UP TO 1945)||1976 back to 1962 (we lost what presidents up to and particularly keennedy understood of the overarching challenge of uni8ted nations; at the same time the birth of the eu core purpose got lost by 1962)||1945 back to 1935: this corresponds to the uniques development period of my father from teenb home schooled in british embassies in moscow and horler's europ to spending his last days as teen allied boimber command burma to surviving woeld wars 2 being mentored by keynes, the economist's geoggery crwother and von neumann; in 1949 dad amrried the daughter of sir kenneth kemp who had written up teh legalese of india's independence;||1935 back to adam smith 1758 this explains why my my family tree was intersection of 4 generation osf scots in inda who had been nurses, pharmacists and social lawyers; and 4 generations of scots who had been missionaries, transnational dimplomats and whatever you call my father and myself ( i would say I am a (future histiry) of mathematician but with at best one hyndredth of the mind of the greatest maths nmetwo9rk that ever lived neumann , einstein et al. i desperately need help from every gps on the plant in recording why particularly whites have not yet designed goverance systems to value right of every next child born - but I belive its valid to ask:|
what exactly was the conflict in 1945 between the 8 biggest empires - g8 twhite and japan; in addition what other conflicts were the g8 surrounded by all white developed nations- in essence engines from 1760 were applied by white men to rule over world trade; in effect less than 15% of the human race had designed almost all the world's wealth for themselves or the nations they lived in ; this was the root cause of world war 2 which the united nations needed to mediate over at most 4 generations - from those returning frow war through to today's younger half of teh wrold who will inherit systems which expoenetially lock them into extcinction unless the 2020s turmns thi round
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Our informal skype alumn group aims to worldwide meet on saturdays 5pm greenwich mean time. What agenda should we be spending our time oin. Here' my vote
My understanding is that we are going to try a group Skype at 5pm greenwich mean time Saturday. I am not the main connector so I will assume he/she will reconfirm if this is the chosen time. I would like to ask whether those who group Skype ( at first or other times) could list at least 1 burning issue they wish to collaboratively resolve
Mine is a bit unusual. I believe millions of youth should be involved in debating - are the world's financial systems designed to sustain what future purposes most families, communities want?. George Soros who Mehrling networks with as educational director of www.ineteconomics.org recently said that economics is as bankrupt as the banks got to be in 2008. He has asked for complete rethinking of economics from ground/community up. So is there a difference between the money system as currently spun by fed and wall street and a "re-thought one" More bluntly: is the purpose of banking designed to help each human being optimize a productive life or to trap most of us in debt? Is the FED owned by the people (and for future generations) or by big bankers who reward themselves for the more volatility/bubbles they spin?
I am concerned because my dad (Norman Macrae) spent the second half of his life from 1972 hosting "Entrepreneurial Revolution") debates in The Economists and elsewhere as to what short-term fixes economists made before and after each world war that would need changing before the world through telecomputer networks became more globally and locally connected. The transformation to economic mapping if net generations were to be sustainable. I don't think these changes have been made. And personally I would bet that open education is our last chance to ask whether we are designing future purposes of health , of food, of energy, of everything that hi-trust communities need to develop above zero-sum trades through time not just extract from each past quarter
We seem to be ruled by a banking system for the 1% of biggest people who live global lives than the 99% of us whose families live in communities. When Adam smith conceptualized free markets in 1750s he specifically meant community markets where human relationships were visible enough that someone might fool some of the people some of the time but not all of the people all of time. When banking markets are designed around too big to fall systems they are certainly not free and not entrepreneurially valuable the way Adam Smith -or my even greater Scottish hero James Wilson mediated. James' project is 170 years old today. This greatest pro-youth economics project began by throwing out of UK parliament of 1843 all big vested interest MPs. Its goal was to mediate economics to end hunger and end capital abuse of youth. It was James; son-in-law Walter Bagehot who continued that quest with his writings that included Lombard Street and what Queen Victoria needed to do to the English Constitution to end slave making empire trades and startup commonwealth. What would James and Walter make of Wall Street's biggest banks. Are they economical or non-economical when assessed by the hi-trust definitions Adam first mapped?
Which economist alive or dead do you trust most? President (of inet) Rob Johnson explains how different the value of Keynes was http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVCJerN6QJM very different than any economic guru who preside over your tv news ...