Why not design future around 7 billion wonderful livelihoods

feb 2022, wash dc-sadly idea of every 3 year old up merits a next door playschool seems to be taking inside beltway lawyers longer than landing on the moon - so women4empowerment have moved collab networks for 3 years up to Abedplay.com.. The debate on whether DC wants every American to be valued by Artificial Intel and hi-trust media ERevolution last chance at the metaverse continues below. May we also suggest EconomistDiary.com if you wish to tap into 4 hemisphere discussions of what the blip is happening to your young graduates era of 100 times more machine maths every decade (since 1951) when an economist sub-editor was briefed by Von Neumann on the biggest journalism scoop of all time and any sustainability generation
After the first year of Biden we can see that in spite of enough technology to save the human race, corralled by insanely lonely men like Mr Putin we are racing faster than ever towards extinction half way through the 15 year period that all nations had committed to the sustainability goals (ecop26 EUN). Why is this? - its a problem of media- which in turn is a wicked Keynesian problem of Governance, Societal and Environmental Markets (known the other way round by worlds biggest decision makers as ESG -see NYccAI.com for 15 annual spring briefings).
CRIMSON LIFESTYLES: Although Harvard has taken as late as 26 April 2022 to admit their debt to black americans is way north of 100 million dollars (imagine if they had admitted this before Biller Gates designed DOS). other far north friends and I can trace through my family ( diaspora scots, irish...) why the root cause of this [problem is that white institutions have not cared locally enough about the simplest human right : that of the next girl or boy born anywhere to have a fair chance of life.

My family has a lot of evidence on this ; in our case it can be classified around tHEse time periods: 2022 to 2000; TO 1984 TO 1976 TO 1962 TO 1945 TO 1936 TO 1758 - each of which we observed  FROM SOME QUITE DEEP GLOBAL VILLAGE DATUM

1962 back to 1951 back to 1945; 1951 was for my family the occasion of the greatest jopurnalist scoop ever; von neumann briefed my father on asking leaderes about what would they do with 100 times more tech every decade to 2020s (som,e now call this industrial revolution 3, 4; in silicon valley from 1965 they have also called its moore's law; my father's small role in future histoiry : he asked economist jouramlsits to appply this question for the next third of the century; this too the economist from 1951 3rd ranked weekly journal to one of a kindf gloabal viewspaper; The Economist had a weird history it was born in 1843 as a royal society chat sheet that got turned into queen visctora's attermpt to chnage english constitution from presiding over slave making empire to commonwealth); this has been the crisis embedded in tyhe english mindset since the beginning of engines scotalnds 1760s (some would say since the beginning of discovery on new worlds started in 1490s when the race started to own the most agressive navy)

2022 back to 2000 -business & social models of mobile digital age spun hatred and short-termsim opposite to sdgs; raised bodres between nations during the period all human communities needed to go borderless on human right goal 2000 back to 1984 (we lost the chnace to value the web as the an open learning network to shortt term commerce and nastier media)m/TD> 1984 back to 1976 ( by now my father was launching the new socio-economic genere of entrepreneuriual revolution with 15 yeras of evidence of cases on asia rising through a blend of supervillaige and supervity whose trades needed over time to be winw-in not zero sum; in fact if voin eneuman used the vocabularu IR3 - he would definme that as eera of applying 100 times more etch to way above zero sum games- THE OPPOSITE TO LEGISLATIRS UP TO 1945)1976 back to 1962 (we lost what presidents up to and particularly keennedy understood of the overarching challenge of uni8ted nations; at the same time the birth of the eu core purpose got lost by 1962) 1945 back to 1935: this corresponds to the uniques development period of my father from teenb home schooled in british embassies in moscow and horler's europ to spending his last days as teen allied boimber command burma to surviving woeld wars 2 being mentored by keynes, the economist's geoggery crwother and von neumann; in 1949 dad amrried the daughter of sir kenneth kemp who had written up teh legalese of india's independence;  1935 back to adam smith 1758  this explains why my my family tree was intersection of 4 generation osf scots in inda who had been nurses, pharmacists and social lawyers; and 4 generations of scots who had been missionaries, transnational dimplomats and whatever you call my father and myself ( i would say I am a (future histiry) of mathematician but with at best one hyndredth of the mind of the greatest maths nmetwo9rk that ever lived neumann , einstein et al. i desperately need help from every gps on the plant in recording why particularly whites have not yet designed goverance systems to value right of every next child born - but I belive its valid to ask:

what exactly was the conflict in 1945 between the 8 biggest empires - g8 twhite and japan; in addition what other conflicts were the g8 surrounded by all white developed nations- in essence engines from 1760 were applied by white men to rule over world trade; in effect less than 15% of the human race had designed almost all the world's wealth for themselves or the nations they lived in ; this was the root cause of world war 2 which the united nations needed to mediate over at most 4 generations - from those returning frow war through to today's younger half of teh wrold who will inherit systems which expoenetially lock them into extcinction unless the 2020s turmns thi round


diversity gamechangers in washington dc admin are rare- can raimondo be one? biden ai panel boldly goes where dc never has since v neumann

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

I know we are all interested in student entrepreneur competitions

I also know that people like chris and I believe that programs like shark tank and apprentice have done endless harm. They value only extraction and exit strategies not those with a higher purpose including job creation

I have judged about 7 competitions now where we were supposed to be valuing entrepreneurs with a higher purpose. But I have found judges rules and some fellow judges acting exactly like the sharks - whats your exit strategy not what's your purpose for developing 

What I am proposing is we design a second set of rules for students who believe they are pitching a purpose not a monetary extraction pitch

Please say if you are interested - then we can work out a process now

Many of us know each other from DC meetings on youth development . Chris is the North of England's leading host of youth job creation through entrepreneurship having run world class summits out of liverpool - also he is launching www.worldmerit.org as an exchange centred around what youth need to develop places. He was part of a panel of speakers in Dc last week at the event hosted at the 1776 portal , which included Gallup's Buckingham who I know some of you work with and launched another youth exchange of YSN. There were several people who appeared to be close partners of Chris who are DC-based so if we are interested in working on this idea on both sides of the atlantic then I expect he could introduce us to a DC confederate. Conversely I have some ideas from people I met in UK and France who wanted to help celebrate the yunus vision of an SMBA. Getting this second set of judging rules out there can also be a trojan horse to MOOC development of the missing course of SMBA. Its worth noting folks that last year even readers at The Economist voted for the proposition that MBA certified students do more harm than good to the future of a nation's development for youth. What are we waiting for?

There have always been 2 opposite sorts of professional system designers:
those representing the less than 1%
those representing the future of the 99%

My father focused on celebrating the Entrepreneur word from 1972 as he debated how to sustain the net generation and design massive collaboration goals to end poverty because the origin of the word refers to the people taking back markets (in france's case by cutting off heads of thise who monopolised productive assets, in us case from english who want to take first cut of every trade with even more virulence than communist moscow want to take first cut of every trade whilst mastering over the USSR). Extreme capitalism and extreme communism are the same faulty system spun round the futures of the 1% most powerful instead of empowering the 99%. I am insulted by people who broadcast entrepreneurs as extractors for the 1%. Worse if you look at what the abominable 3rd grade curriculum of social studies requires children to learn in USA you will see they are required to be examined on the precisely wrong definition of entrepreneurship. Ultimately we need trojan horses not just for giving youth an alternative to MBA but all the way through job creating education from 3rd grade up. Fortunately we have a worldwide map of exactly which educators are scaling that though we dont have anyone with systemic access in the USA -well we do its sal khan but he doesnt know it yet!

PS YSN has a way of putting youth at the epicentre of livelihoods and careers
worth looking at http://ysn.com/go/ Is there a way that youth subchapters of conscious capitalism can partner with this

No comments:

Post a Comment